# Lease Modification Accounting under ASC 842: Operating Lease to Operating Lease

by | Aug 28, 2019 | 6 comments

In this blog, we will give an example of how to account for a lease modification under ASC 842 that does not expand or add additional assets to the original lease, but rather increases the lease term and changes the payment amounts. Because there isn’t an additional right of use (ROU) asset granted per 842-10-25-1, the lessee would use the updated lease payments and an updated discount rate to remeasure the lease liability and would recognize any difference between the new lease liability and the old lease liability as an adjustment to the ROU asset. If that sounds complicated, it is. It is complicated because there is no discussion on how to amortize the ROU asset after the modification. Here’s an example:

Assume a 10-year lease with annual payments in arrears of \$100,000 increasing by 3% each year. Assume the discount rate is 6%, and for purposes of this example, assume this is an operating lease. The initial amortization schedule for this lease is as follows:

You can build your own amortization schedule like the one above using Excel or download our free present value calculator:

## Initial journal entry:

Based on the amortization schedule above, the initial journal entry to make is as follows:

 DR ROU Asset 831,880.38 CR Operating Lease Liability 831,880.38

To record the lease liability and corresponding ROU asset at lease commencement

## Journal entry 2:

Please note that the journal entry above is made at the beginning of year one. At the end of year one when payment is made (recall that payments are made in arrears in this example), the journal entry to reflect the payment is as follows:

 DR Rent Expense 49,912.82 DR Lease Liability 50,087.18 CR Cash 100,000.00

To record year one rent payment of 100,000

## Journal entry 3:

In addition to the entry above, the ROU asset must be amortized. It is amortized as the difference between straight-line rent expense and liability expense. Straight-line rent expense is \$114,638.79 while the liability expense for year one is \$49,912.82. So, the ROU amortization journal entry is as follows:

 DR Rent Expense 64,725.97 CR ROU Asset 64,725.97

To record amortization for the ROU asset in year one

## Journal entries 2 and 3 combined:

Please note that journal entries 2 and 3 can be – and in practice usually are – combined to give the following entry:

 DR Rent Expense 114,638.79 DR Lease Liability 50,087.18 CR Cash 100,000.00 CR ROU Asset 64,725.97

To record payment and ROU amortization for year one

## Journal entry 4:

Now, let us assume that at the end of year five, the lease is modified and extended by five years. Assume that the year six payment is now going to be \$150,000 rather than \$115,927.41 per the previous lease agreement. Also assume that the annual payments still increase by 3% each year. Finally, assume that the discount rate is now 7% rather than 6%. Based on these predicates, the amortization schedule for the modified lease is as follows:

At the end of year five under the old lease, the lease liability should be \$516,738.59. After the modification, however, the new lease liability should be \$1,188,078.97. The lease liability should then be credited by \$671,340.38. The corresponding entry will be a debit to the ROU asset, as reflected below:

 DR ROU Asset 671,340.38 CR Lease Liability 671,340.38

To record increase in lease liability and ROU asset due to lease modification

## Journal entry 5:

Please note that the entry above will be recorded at the time of the modification. When the payment is made at the end of year six, (once again, payments are made in arrears) the combined journal entry to reflect payment is as follows:

 DR Rent Expense 83,165.53 DR Lease Liability 66,834.47 CR Cash 150,000.00

To record lease payment for year six

## Journal entry 6:

Like Journal Entry 3, the company needs to record amortization of the ROU Asset. Once again, it is amortized as the difference between straight-line rent expense and liability expense. The new straight-line rent expense (post modification) is \$167,730.15 while the liability expense for year one is \$83,165.53. So, the ROU amortization journal entry is as follows:

 DR Rent Expense 84,564.62 CR ROU Asset 84,564.62

To record amortization for the ROU asset in year six

There you have it – a comprehensive example showing how to modify an operating lease under ASC 842 when there is no additional ROU asset and the modified lease remains an operating lease. In a subsequent blog, we will give a comprehensive example showing the entries to make when a modified operating lease results in a change in lease classification from operating to finance.

1. Are there no entries booked to Interest/for Liability expense?

I understand everything except for that.

Thanks,

• Hi,

Under ASC 842 the liability lease expense and the asset amoritzation expense equal the total rent expense. In this example, the liability lease expense of \$83,185.53 is booked to rent expense in journal entry 5. Further, in journal entry 6 the ROU asset expense or asset amortization expense is booked to rent expense as well. Both of these expense components for the lease is included in total rent expense.

2. If a Tenant leases space in Building A and the Landlord and Tenant agree to move the Tenant to Building B (the landlord owns both Building A and Building B), does they trigger a Lease Modification? Or does the Tenant Terminate the lease in Building A and account for the new Lease in Building B as a new separate lease contract? Thank you.

• Hi Mitchell,

A modification triggers a separate/new lease when both of the following criteria are met (1) the lessee has additional rights that weren’t outlined in the original lease (i.e. new property) and (2) the payments increase proportionate to the standalone price of the additional asset, adjusted for the circumstances of the particular contract (i.e. new payments).

One of the first questions you need to ask is whether the orginal lease agreement allowed for substantive substitution rights. If the lease allowed for substitutions, there would not be a new lease or a lease modification because the lessor can replace the asset with another similar asset with no impact to the lease.

The payments increasing proportionate to the standalone price of the additional asset is also a question. An example provided by the guidance of this is a tenant of a building leasing additional floors and the consideration increasing but not equal to renting the space on a standalone basis. In this instance the leases would not be separated. For your scenario it depends on what the tenant is being charged for the new lease in Building B. If it is substantially the same as the consideration for Building A, they would be separate leases. However, if the total required consideration for Building B is significantly less then the original lease, this would be treated as a lease modification.

Please note that these are questions to consider to make the final determination related to this scenario. A company would need to review all of the facts and circumstances of the specific lease and use their judgement to decide upon which lease accounting treatment to use.

Regards,
LeaseQuery